AO — Accountability & Operating Model
AO-02: Executive accountability and AI governance forum
Establish a cross-functional AI governance forum with documented authority to approve, restrict or stop AI use cases.
At a glance
- Pillar
- AO — Accountability & Operating Model
- Priority
- critical
- Applies to
- All AI systems
- Typical owner
- Executive sponsor (CIO/CRO/COO)
- VERITRAIL modules
- Control
- Control library
- v1.0.0
Evidence that demonstrates this control
Examples of records an assessor would expect to see. Until a named reviewer has examined them, evidence is labelled User-asserted or Missing evidence in VERITRAIL outputs, never Verified.
- Forum terms of reference
- Membership list
- Decision log or minutes showing approve/restrict/stop decisions
Indicative framework mappings
| Framework | References |
|---|---|
| NIST AI RMF | GOVERN 2.1, GOVERN 2.3 |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | 5.1, 5.3, A.3.2 |
| EU AI Act | Art. 17 |
Framework mappings are indicative VERITRAIL interpretations to support governance readiness and evidence collection. They do not constitute legal advice, a certification, or a determination of conformity with ISO/IEC 42001 or compliance with the EU AI Act or any other law.
Where the self-assessment asks about it
- STR-Q2 — Is there a cross-functional AI governance forum with authority to approve, restrict, or stop AI use cases?
Related critical risk flags
- No AI governance policy or accountable owner — Without a policy and owner, no one is accountable for AI risk decisions.
Last reviewed: